Its the largest caiman vs the largest snake. Both Purussaurus and Titanoboa were apex predators in South America. Purussaurus lived in the Miocene Epoch while Titanoboa lived in the Paleocene Epoch. So these creatures never met but what if they did?
Length: 12 Meters
Weight: 8 Tons
Bite Force: 7 Tons
Diet: Fish, Turtles, Crocodilians, Mammals, Birds and even Fruits
Enemies: Other Purussaurus
Length: 14.6 Meters
Weight: 1 Ton
Constriction: 400 PSI
Diet: Fish, Turtles, Crocodilians, Snakes and even other Titanoboa’s
Enemies: Acherontisuchus, Carbonemys and Other Titanoboa’s
Stronger Bite Force
Faster on Land
Better Fighting Experience
Not as Long
Slower in Water
Less Hunting Experience
Constriction can Kill the Caiman
Faster in Water
Better Hunting Experience
Can Kill the Caiman With Constriction
Less Powerful Bite
Slower on Land
Less Fighting Experience
Verdict: I think Purussaurus would win 65% of the time due to its Fighting Experience and Bite Force. But if Titanoboa were to attack Purussaurus by surprise then Titanoboa would constrict the caiman and win. But in a head on fight, Purussaurus wins. But what do you think? please comment and tell me your thoughts.
I choose Purussaurus,also The True Shark boy,did you take inspiration from my topic:
Deinosuchus Vs. Titanoboa?
Nice to see you’re back shark! I agree that Purussaurus would win, unless Titanoboa actually did feed on crocodiles. Then I think Titanoboa would win
If people weren't lazy, we wouldn't try to be efficient. If we weren't efficient, we'd never get anything done.
I’ve been really busy with school work and football. But don’t worry I’ll be here to only respond to topics such as aquatic or terrestrial battles.
Sign in to add a reply to this topic!